Purdue University Mark

Purdue University

Reflections on Teaching and Learning

The Replacement Model

The video above is a (less than) 1-minute explanation of the replacement model. What follows is more detail.
If we take the view from the balcony, as it were, each redesign model might be defined by how to relates to the traditional lecture format model. The supplemental model doesn’t change the traditional lecture model, just adds to it – thus ‘supplemental’. With the replacement model the surgery into the traditional lecture model starts, piecemeal. Like replacing a knee or a hip, the replacement model takes an existing part that may not be working how it’s supposed to and in its place puts a bionic replacement that ideally does the job, but does it better.
In the replamcement model Dr. Frazee (my new example instructor) takes one or two of the regular lectures (hence keeps one or two) and replaces them with online content. The online content depends on the course – it could be exercises, problem sets, simulations, group discussion, or a combination. This online content will not be without support, but will give students feedback and allow them to practice concepts. The idea is – students can learn the content more efficiently this way than sitting in class. There is still class time – and what the instructor chooses to do with that class time is the next question in the process.
There’s a decision to be made. Dr. Frazee can keep them the way they are or alter them based on the online content. If the online content covers material that was going to be covered in class, then class time can be spent going into more detail. It can be spend answering questions or having students work through more complicated applications of the content. Ideally, it takes advantage of the face-to-face time that class allows and activities include interaction with feedback.

This entry was posted in Course Redesign, Hans on Tech. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Bill Crum

    Hans, thanks for bringing this idea forward… Doesn’t the university have an expectation that students spend 2-3 hours outside of class for every credit hour of a course (per week)? This expectation of effort may include assignment completion or studying. It is my understanding that this expectation is what makes a student “full-time” despite being in the classroom only 15-20 hours per week. Would this not make removing an official meeting unnecessary? Or is that answer dependent on how unique (or different) the material available on-line is from that presented face-to-face?

    • Hans Aagard

      Bill, apologies for the slow reply.nnThe approach you suggest is a good one – if you want to keep the lecture, and add out of class exercizes, you can. This is right in line with the previous model I described, the supplemental model, which adds out of class time to the existing course, usually with online content.nAs you point out, time in class is tied to the registrar’s credit hour designation for the course. There’s more information here: http://www.purdue.edu/registrar/pdf/Credit_Hour_Guidelines.pdf. nReplacing the lecture time with online learning will need to take that into account. Dropping the lecture appears to be a decision made based on the effectiveness of the time spent in class versus the time spent outside of class with practice.

  • Joe Conte

    How does this model for replacement compare with substituting a lab/recitation section in place of the displaced meeting time? Couldn’t that also provide the framework for “exercises, problem sets, simulations, group discussion, or a combination. … give students feedback and allow them to practice concepts.”

Inquiries or comments: itap@purdue.edu

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA, (765) 494-4600
© 2012 Purdue University. An equal access, equal opportunity university.
If you have trouble accessing this page because of a disability, please contact ITaP at itap@purdue.edu.